• Improve performance
  • Useful guides
  • Video card buying guide
  • Review database

Main Menu

  • Home and News
  • Improve performance
  • Useful guides
  • Articles

Review database

  • Video cards
  • CPUs
  • Motherboards
  • Other

Language

English French German Italian Portuguese Russian Spanish

Useful links


Lili Directory

Support this site

PayPal

Enter Amount:

$

Mobile Core 2 CPU benchmarks - Duo vs Quad
Page 1 of 3

A lot has been said about quad core processors in the last few years. Most people still believe, that today's software can not use quad core processors properly (is not threaded enough) and buy dual core processors instead. That is mostly because quads are pricey, but when it comes to laptops, there is another concern - power consumption. In this short review I will try to compare two mobile processors, Core 2 Duo T9600 and Core 2 Quad Q9100.

Label Clock speed L2 cache TDP
T9600 2800MHz 6MB 35W
Q9100 2260MHz 12MB 45W

So we are talking about two very capable mobile processors. Q9100 is very pricey and still a bit exotic, because today's market is not yet ready for mobile quads. T9600 on the other hand is cheaper, has two cores less, but runs at a higher frequency. What does that mean? Will its frequency make it up for the "missing" cores? We will see. Let's look at the laptop configuration first:

Manufacturer Model Memory Video card Hard drive OS
HP HDX18 4GB DDR3 1066 GF9600M GT 1GB DDR2 320GB 7200rpm vista 64-bit

Benchmarks were ran on two different laptops, but the only noticeable difference between them was the CPU, so results should be very comparable. Let's look at 3DMark 06 results first:

c2q1

We can see, that the quad outperforms T9600 in pretty much every test. That is because 3DMark can use more cores than just one. The difference in final score is mainly a consequence of high Q9100 CPU test score, although there is also small performance difference in normal, GPU-based tests. 9600M GT is a quite slow video card, so this difference would probably be a lot more noticeable with a more powerful one like a Geforce 9800M GTX, which can make better use of extra CPU power. Please proceed to the next page for more benchmarks.


<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 Next > End >>

  • Add New
Comments (4)
  • 2011-12-03 01:53:17 |113.91.234.xxx| alice  - www.promotekey.com

    Promotekey.com offers a variety of promotional bags packs such as: Plastic, Tote, Beach, Canvas, Lunch, Duffle, and Backpacks, monogrammed bag hanger , embroidered tote bags, custom imprinted tote bags, plastic promotional bags, promotional computer bags, promotional laptop bags, promotional duffle bags.
    Promotekey has a huge selection of promotional bags in all sizes, styles, shapes, colors, and price ranges

    • 0
    • 0
    ReplyQuote
  • 2011-12-03 01:52:59 |113.91.234.xxx| promotekey.com  - www.promotekey.com

    I’m truly enjoying the design and layout of your website. It’s a very easy on the eyes which makes it much more enjoyable for me to come here and visit more often. Did you hire out a designer to create your theme? Outstanding work!

    • 0
    • 0
    ReplyQuote
  • 2010-04-10 07:46:54 |173.98.91.xxx| Smart Person  - invalid testing

    This review is worthless...its not a direct comparison. You should have swapped processors in one machine (both processors should be supported by the chipset)that way we know for sure its the processor performance we see and not that of any other parts in the system. Good try though.

    • 1
    • 2
    ReplyQuote
  • 2010-04-12 00:04:40 |93.103.42.xxx| admin  - reply

    There were little to none such comparisons online, when this "review" was written. I must say, that these tests were done on two very similar but separate HP HDX18 computers by the same person, so they are very comparable. These two laptops did not differ in terms of motherboard, RAM, graphics card etc.

    • 1
    • 1
    ReplyQuote
Write comment
Your Contact Details:
Comment:
[b] [i] [u] [url] [quote] [code] [img]   
Security
Security Image
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.
Joomla components by Compojoom
 

Valid XHTML and CSS.